|
|
 | | Author | |
|
| | Date | |
|
|
|
|
David Jade |
14:29 3 Feb 11 |
|
|
Tom Kershaw |
10:34 28 Feb 10 |
|
|
Barry Wilkinson |
4:08 2 Mar 10 |
|
|
Tom Kershaw |
12:51 14 Mar 10 |
|
|
Elliot |
12:30 11 Jan 10 |
|
|
Elliot |
7:01 16 Feb 10 |
|
|
Dr. Elliot Puritz |
17:19 22 Dec 09 |
|
|
Dr. Elliot Puritz |
17:11 22 Dec 09 |
|
|
Barry Wilkinson |
2:37 1 Jan 10 |
|
  |
Re: 31 Step wedge usable, or only a 21 step wedge? |
|
Steve Nicholls |
5:28 7 Jan 10 |
 |
Hi Elliot,
31 steps would require a rewrite of the entire WinPlotter software. Myself I have never found any practical limitations with 21 steps. I know Ben Wilbur, also on this list, actually plots by hand so I cannot say for certain if 31 steps would be practical or not done manually. I think Phil did address this issue at one stage but I cannot say where. From my recollection [dangerous at best  ] Phil indicated the software gave very accurate intermediate values by "french curve" style interpolation.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
